Cooperation without punishment | Scientific Reports


  • Fehr, E. & Rockenbach, B. Detrimental effects of sanctions on human altruism. Nature 422, 137–140 (2003).

    Article 
    ADS 
    CAS 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Herrmann, B., Thoni, C. & Gachter, S. Antisocial punishment across societies. Science 319, 1362–1367 (2008).

    Article 
    ADS 
    CAS 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Nikiforakis, N. Punishment and counter-punishment in public good games: Can we really govern ourselves?. J. Public Econ. 92, 91–112 (2008).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Olson, M. The logic of collective action [1965]. Contemporary Sociological Theory124 (2012).

  • Ostrom, E. Collective action and the evolution of social norms. J. Econ. Perspect. 14, 137–158 (2000).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Rand, D. G. & Nowak, M. A. The evolution of antisocial punishment in optional public goods games. Nat. Commun. 2, 1–7 (2011).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Roth, A. E. & Kagel, J. H. The Handbook of Experimental Economics Vol. 1 (Princeton University Press, Princeton, 1995).


    Google Scholar
     

  • Dawes, R. M. Social dilemmas. Annu. Rev. Psychol. 31, 169–193 (1980).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Dietz, T., Ostrom, E. & Stern, P. C. The struggle to govern the commons. Science 302, 1907–1912 (2003).

    Article 
    ADS 
    CAS 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Falk, A., Fehr, E. & Fischbacher, U. On the nature of fair behavior. Econ. Inq. 41, 20–26 (2003).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Fehr, E. & Fischbacher, U. The nature of human altruism. Nature 425, 785–791 (2003).

    Article 
    ADS 
    CAS 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Fehr, E. & Fischbacher, U. Social norms and human cooperation. Trends Cogn. Sci. 8, 185–190 (2004).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Fehr, E. & Gächter, S. Fairness and retaliation: The economics of reciprocity. J. Econ. Perspect. 14, 159–181 (2000).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Fehr, E. & Gächter, S. Cooperation and punishment in public goods experiments. Am. Econ. Rev. 90, 980–994 (2000).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Fehr, E. & Gächter, S. Altruistic punishment in humans. Nature 415, 137–140 (2002).

    Article 
    ADS 
    CAS 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Fischbacher, U., Gächter, S. & Fehr, E. Are people conditionally cooperative? evidence from a public goods experiment. Econ. Lett. 71, 397–404 (2001).

    Article 
    MATH 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Frey, B. S. & Stutzer, A. Economics and Psychology: A Promising New Cross-Disciplinary Field (MIT Press, Cambridge and London, 2007).

    Book 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Gintis, H., Bowles, S., Boyd, R. & Fehr, E. Explaining altruistic behavior in humans. Evol. Hum. Behav. 24, 153–172 (2003).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Gintis, H., Henrich, J., Bowles, S., Boyd, R. & Fehr, E. Strong reciprocity and the roots of human morality. Soc. Justice Res. 21, 241–253 (2008).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Henrich, J. et al. In search of homo economicus: Behavioral experiments in 15 small-scale societies. Am. Econ. Rev. 91, 73–78 (2001).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Ostrom, E. Governing the Commons: The Evolution of Institutions for Collective Action (Cambridge University Press, 1990).

  • Ledyard, J. Public Goods: A Survey of Experimental Research. In The Handbook of Experimental Economics (Princeton University Press, Princeton, 1995).

  • Sigmund, K. The calculus of selfishness. In The Calculus of Selfishness (Princeton Series in Theoretical and Computational Biology). (Princeton University Press, 2010).

  • Camerer, C. F. & Fehr, E. When does“ economic man’’ dominate social behavior?. Science 311, 47–52 (2006).

    Article 
    ADS 
    CAS 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Hardin, G. The tragedy of the commons: The population problem has no technical solution; it requires a fundamental extension in morality. Science 162, 1243–1248 (1968).

    Article 
    ADS 
    CAS 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Frey, B. S. & Torgler, B. Tax morale and conditional cooperation. J. Comp. Econ. 35, 136–159 (2007).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Keser, C. & Van Winden, F. Conditional cooperation and voluntary contributions to public goods. Scand. J. Econ. 102, 23–39 (2000).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Baldassarri, D. & Grossman, G. Centralized sanctioning and legitimate authority promote cooperation in humans. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 108, 11023–11027 (2011).

    Article 
    ADS 
    CAS 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Henrich, J. Cooperation, punishment, and the evolution of human institutions. Science 312, 60–61 (2006).

    Article 
    CAS 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Boyd, R., Gintis, H., Bowles, S. & Richerson, P. J. The evolution of altruistic punishment. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 100, 3531–3535 (2003).

    Article 
    ADS 
    CAS 

    Google Scholar
     

  • De Quervain, D. J. et al. The neural basis of altruistic punishment. Science 305, 1254–1258 (2004).

    Article 
    ADS 

    Google Scholar
     

  • De Weerd, H. & Verbrugge, R. Evolution of altruistic punishment in heterogeneous populations. J. Theor. Biol. 290, 88–103 (2011).

    Article 
    ADS 
    MATH 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Fowler, J. H. Altruistic punishment and the origin of cooperation. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 102, 7047–7049 (2005).

    Article 
    ADS 
    CAS 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Szolnoki, A. & Perc, M. Effectiveness of conditional punishment for the evolution of public cooperation. J. Theor. Biol. 325, 34–41 (2013).

    Article 
    ADS 
    MATH 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Ohdaira, T. Evolution of cooperation by the introduction of the probabilistic peer-punishment based on the difference of payoff. Sci. Rep. 6, 1–9 (2016).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Ohdaira, T. Characteristics of the evolution of cooperation by the probabilistic peer-punishment based on the difference of payoff. Chaos, Solitons Fractals 95, 77–83 (2017).

    Article 
    ADS 
    MATH 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Ohdaira, T. A remarkable effect of the combination of probabilistic peer-punishment and coevolutionary mechanism on the evolution of cooperation. Sci. Rep. 7, 1–9 (2017).

    Article 
    CAS 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Ohdaira, T. The probabilistic pool punishment proportional to the difference of payoff outperforms previous pool and peer punishment. Sci. Rep. 12, 1–8 (2022).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Sarkar, R. Decentralised forest governance in central himalayas: A re-evaluation of outcomes. Econ. Pol. Wkly 43, 54–61 (2008).


    Google Scholar
     

  • Hilbe, C., Traulsen, A., Röhl, T. & Milinski, M. Democratic decisions establish stable authorities that overcome the paradox of second-order punishment. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 111, 752–756 (2014).

    Article 
    ADS 
    CAS 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Panchanathan, K. & Boyd, R. Indirect reciprocity can stabilize cooperation without the second-order free rider problem. Nature 432, 499–502 (2004).

    Article 
    ADS 
    CAS 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Liu, L., Chen, X. & Szolnoki, A. Evolutionary dynamics of cooperation in a population with probabilistic corrupt enforcers and violators. Math. Models Methods Appl. Sci. 29, 2127–2149 (2019).

    Article 
    MATH 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Salahshour, M., Oberhauser, V. & Smerlak, M. The cost of noise: Stochastic punishment falls short of sustaining cooperation in social dilemma experiments. PLoS ONE 17, e0263028 (2022).

    Article 
    CAS 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Battu, B. Evolution of altruistic punishments among heterogeneous conditional cooperators. Sci. Rep. 11, 1–12 (2021).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Bowles, S. Policies designed for self-interested citizens may undermine“ the moral sentiments’’: Evidence from economic experiments. Science 320, 1605–1609 (2008).

    Article 
    ADS 
    CAS 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Fehr, E. & Falk, A. Psychological foundations of incentives. Eur. Econ. Rev. 46, 687–724 (2002).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Fehr, E. & Fischbacher, U. Why social preferences matter-the impact of non-selfish motives on competition, cooperation and incentives. Econ. J. 112, C1–C33 (2002).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Fudenberg, D., Rand, D. G. & Dreber, A. Slow to anger and fast to forgive: Cooperation in an uncertain world. Am. Econ. Rev. 102, 720–49 (2012).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Bear, A. & Rand, D. G. Intuition, deliberation, and the evolution of cooperation. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 113, 936–941 (2016).

    Article 
    ADS 
    CAS 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Mosleh, M. & Rand, D. G. Population structure promotes the evolution of intuitive cooperation and inhibits deliberation. Sci. Rep. 8, 1–8 (2018).

    Article 
    CAS 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Szolnoki, A., Xie, N.-G., Wang, C. & Perc, M. Imitating emotions instead of strategies in spatial games elevates social welfare. EPL (Europhys. Lett.) 96, 38002 (2011).

    Article 
    ADS 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Szolnoki, A., Xie, N.-G., Ye, Y. & Perc, M. Evolution of emotions on networks leads to the evolution of cooperation in social dilemmas. Phys. Rev. E 87, 042805 (2013).

    Article 
    ADS 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Rand, D. G., Dreber, A., Ellingsen, T., Fudenberg, D. & Nowak, M. A. Positive interactions promote public cooperation. Science 325, 1272–1275 (2009).

    Article 
    ADS 
    CAS 
    MATH 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Shirado, H. & Christakis, N. A. Network engineering using autonomous agents increases cooperation in human groups. Iscience 23, 101438 (2020).

    Article 
    ADS 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Szolnoki, A. & Perc, M. Reward and cooperation in the spatial public goods game. EPL (Europhys. Lett.) 92, 38003 (2010).

    Article 
    ADS 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Szolnoki, A. & Perc, M. Evolutionary advantages of adaptive rewarding. New J. Phys. 14, 093016 (2012).

    Article 
    ADS 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Szolnoki, A. & Perc, M. Correlation of positive and negative reciprocity fails to confer an evolutionary advantage: Phase transitions to elementary strategies. Phys. Rev. X 3, 041021 (2013).


    Google Scholar
     

  • Ohdaira, T. Cooperation evolves by the payoff-difference-based probabilistic reward. Eur. Phys. J. B 94, 1–8 (2021).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Traxler, C. & Spichtig, M. Social norms and the indirect evolution of conditional cooperation. J. Econ. 102, 237–262 (2011).

    Article 
    MATH 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Gavrilets, S. & Richerson, P. J. Collective action and the evolution of social norm internalization. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 114, 6068–6073 (2017).

    Article 
    ADS 
    CAS 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Ohdaira, T. Coevolution between the cost of decision and the strategy contributes to the evolution of cooperation. Sci. Rep. 9, 1–9 (2019).

    Article 
    CAS 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Hauert, C., Traulsen, A., Brandt, H., Nowak, M. A. & Sigmund, K. Via freedom to coercion: The emergence of costly punishment. Science 316, 1905–1907 (2007).

    Article 
    ADS 
    CAS 
    MATH 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Hauert, C., De Monte, S., Hofbauer, J. & Sigmund, K. Volunteering as red queen mechanism for cooperation in public goods games. Science 296, 1129–1132 (2002).

    Article 
    ADS 
    CAS 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Hauert, C., De Monte, S., Hofbauer, J. & Sigmund, K. Replicator dynamics for optional public good games. J. Theor. Biol. 218, 187–194 (2002).

    Article 
    ADS 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Tavoni, A., Dannenberg, A., Kallis, G. & Löschel, A. Inequality, communication, and the avoidance of disastrous climate change in a public goods game. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 108, 11825–11829 (2011).

    Article 
    ADS 
    CAS 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Nowak, M. A. & Sigmund, K. Evolutionary dynamics of biological games. Science 303, 793–799 (2004).

    Article 
    ADS 
    CAS 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Bowles, S. & Gintis, H. A cooperative species: Human reciprocity and its evolution. In A Cooperative Species (Princeton University Press, 2011).

  • McCabe, K. A., Rigdon, M. L. & Smith, V. L. Positive reciprocity and intentions in trust games. J. Econ. Behav. Organ. 52, 267–275 (2003).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Battu, B., Pammi, V. & Srinivasan, N. Evolution of cooperation with heterogeneous conditional cooperators. Sci. Rep. 8, 1–7 (2018).

    Article 
    CAS 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Battu, B. & Srinivasan, N. Evolution of conditional cooperation in public good games. Royal Soc. Open Sci. 7, 191567 (2020).

    Article 
    ADS 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Schmelz, K. & Bowles, S. Overcoming covid-19 vaccination resistance when alternative policies affect the dynamics of conformism, social norms, and crowding out. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 118, e2104912118 (2021).

    Article 
    CAS 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Blair, M. M. & Stout, L. A. Trust, trustworthiness, and the behavioral foundations of corporate law. Univ. Pa. Law Rev. 149, 1735–1810 (2001).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Gambetta, D., Gambetta, D. et al. Can we Trust Trust. In Gambetta, D., Ed., Trust: Making and Breaking Cooperative Relations13, 213–237 (2000).

  • Fehr, E. Behavioral foundations of corporate culture (University of Zurich, Public Paper, 2018).

  • Frey, B. S. & Meier, S. Social comparisons and pro-social behavior: Testing“ conditional cooperation’’ in a field experiment. Am. Econ. Rev. 94, 1717–1722 (2004).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Rustagi, D., Engel, S. & Kosfeld, M. Conditional cooperation and costly monitoring explain success in forest commons management. Science 330, 961–965 (2010).

    Article 
    ADS 
    CAS 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Turner, M. A. & Smaldino, P. E. Stubborn extremism as a potential pathway to group polarization. In the 42nd Annual Virtual Meeting of the Cognitive Science (2020).

  • Centola, D., Becker, J., Brackbill, D. & Baronchelli, A. Experimental evidence for tipping points in social convention. Science 360, 1116–1119 (2018).

    Article 
    ADS 
    CAS 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Efferson, C., Vogt, S. & Fehr, E. The promise and the peril of using social influence to reverse harmful traditions. Nat. Hum. Behav. 4, 55–68 (2020).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Iacopini, I., Petri, G., Baronchelli, A. & Barrat, A. Group interactions modulate critical mass dynamics in social convention. Commun. Phys. 5, 1–10 (2022).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Kocher, M. G., Cherry, T., Kroll, S., Netzer, R. J. & Sutter, M. Conditional cooperation on three continents. Econ. Lett. 101, 175–178 (2008).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Hauert, C. & Szabó, G. Game theory and physics. Am. J. Phys. 73, 405–414 (2005).

    Article 
    ADS 
    MATH 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Gächter, S., Kölle, F. & Quercia, S. Reciprocity and the tragedies of maintaining and providing the commons. Nat. Hum. Behav. 1, 650–656 (2017).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Nowak, M. A. Five rules for the evolution of cooperation. Science 314, 1560–1563 (2006).

    Article 
    ADS 
    CAS 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Nakahashi, W., Wakano, J. Y. & Henrich, J. Adaptive social learning strategies in temporally and spatially varying environments. Hum. Nat. 23, 386–418 (2012).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Perc, M. et al. Statistical physics of human cooperation. Phys. Rep. 687, 1–51 (2017).

    Article 
    ADS 
    MATH 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Szabó, G. & Fath, G. Evolutionary games on graphs. Phys. Rep. 446, 97–216 (2007).

    Article 
    ADS 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Source link

    Cooperation without punishment | Scientific Reports

    CHOOSE YOUR CHOICE GIFT CARD OFFER TODAY

    Leave a Reply

    Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

    Scroll to top